Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfs automatically

From: Mike Makonnen (mtm_at_identd.net)
Date: 07/29/03

  • Next message: Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha" 
    Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:21:23 -0400
To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>

    On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
    > On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote:
    >
    >
    > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some
    > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a
    > >jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a jail. Otherwise, you risk
    > >exposing "undesired" device nodes to the virtual environment. I suspect a
    > >search of the -current archives will turn up who, but I think a necessary
    > >part of a solution here will be to make sure jails are set up with the
    > >right devfs contents.
    >
    > Sorry, overseen. Sct W. Hetzel was the submitter, but it never becomes
    > committed. If could be be so kind, please :-) (of course, not without
    > prove it first)

    Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
    patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll
    dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the
    two.

    Cheers. 

    -- 
Mike Makonnen  | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc
mtm@identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9  A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9
mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon!
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: BIND inside a jail on FreeBSD 6.0
      ... devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RAPPLY: Operation not permitted ... (I realize that BIND already runs in a chroot'd environment, ... I tried mounting the devfs outside the jail to the jail's ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: devfs creates unwanted devices in jail after ruleset applied
      ... I am running a DNS server in a jail and have setup a devfs mount in the ... devfs -m JAILDIR/dev rule -s 35 add path random unhide ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Jails
      ... > I have recently completed a clean install of FreeBSD 5.1. ... > followed the instructions to the letter for creating a jail. ... you need to mount devfs i.e. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • devfs creates unwanted devices in jail after ruleset applied
      ... I am running a DNS server in a jail and have setup a devfs mount in the ... devfs -m JAILDIR/dev rule -s 35 add path random unhide ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Phantom Jails
      ... wait for the sockets to go away entirely and then stop the jail ... because what keeps the jail up is not a socket but is related to devfs ... So you're implying, that releasing the ucreds, that in this case ...
      (freebsd-hackers)