Does bimap (ipnat) work to anyone ?
From: Piotr Koper (koper_at_diab.eu.org)
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: Bosko Milekic: "Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic"
- Next in thread: Matt Douhan: "SV: Does bimap (ipnat) work to anyone ?"
- Reply: Matt Douhan: "SV: Does bimap (ipnat) work to anyone ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:33:27 +0200 To: current@freebsd.org
Hi,
Does ``bimap'' work to anyone ? I'm using IP Filter: v3.4.31 (336) and
I can't make it work for me:
ipnat.conf:
bimap fxp0 212.182.x.x/32 -> 192.168.10.5/32
I have aditional ethernet alias (212.182.x.x) and when I ping this
address from the Internet it replys from 192.168.10.5, traceroute shows
this as destination also. The funny thing is that mtr shows many many
destinations with address 192.168.10.5.
while this works fine:
rdr fxp0 212.182.x.x/32 port 0 -> 192.168.10.5 port 0 tcp/udp
rdr fxp0 212.182.x.x/32 port 0 -> 192.168.10.5 port 0 icmp
map fxp0 192.168.10.5/32 -> 212.182.x.x/32
So.. is bimap working well ?
Piotr Koper
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bosko Milekic: "Re: FreeBSD 5.1-R kernel panic"
- Next in thread: Matt Douhan: "SV: Does bimap (ipnat) work to anyone ?"
- Reply: Matt Douhan: "SV: Does bimap (ipnat) work to anyone ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
