Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)
From: Daniel Eischen (eischen_at_vigrid.com)
Date: 08/02/03
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)"
- Next in thread: Julian Elischer: "Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:22:31 -0400 (EDT) To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> >
> > Perhaps we need to rethink the interface and disallow specification
> > of any ldt; only allow dynamic. We would need a different method of
> > setting an array of them, though.
>
> I think that for now we can allow anything over 6 because we are not a
> BSDI binary.
That's a quick fix, yes. But I still think we should put
things in place to disallow this and favor the dynamic
ldt creation. I can only see it rearing its ugly head
at some point in the future when our thread libraries
get more widespread use.
-- Dan Eischen _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)"
- In reply to: Julian Elischer: "Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)"
- Next in thread: Julian Elischer: "Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|