Re: -current brake ufs for -stable
From: Marc G. Fournier (scrappy_at_hub.org)
Date: 09/21/03
- Previous message: Doug White: "Re: really 4.9 stability"
- In reply to: Doug White: "Re: -current brake ufs for -stable"
- Next in thread: Bruce Evans: "Re: -current brake ufs for -stable"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: -current brake ufs for -stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:34:00 -0300 (ADT) To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>
> > I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I
> > plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there).
> > I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted
> > with -stable I've found the partition FS was broken.
> > I think it's because of extended atributes -current wrote on it. I don't
> > like to turn off extended attributes on -current at all. I'd like to
> > have some option for mount to disable it (I've not found it on manpage).
>
> If you newfs'd the partition with -current, you made it UFS2. -stable
> can't mount UFS2 partitions. Newfs it with -stable (or the appropirate
> option on -current, I don't recall it) so its mountable on both systems.
Actually, he did state that "I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it
from -current" ...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Doug White: "Re: really 4.9 stability"
- In reply to: Doug White: "Re: -current brake ufs for -stable"
- Next in thread: Bruce Evans: "Re: -current brake ufs for -stable"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: -current brake ufs for -stable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|