Re: procfs problem
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 09/30/03
- Previous message: Nate Lawson: "Re: [acpi-jp 2706] Re: Odd ACPI behavior"
- In reply to: Jason Stone: "Re: procfs problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:34:40 -0700 To: Jason Stone <freebsd-current@dfmm.org>
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:40:49PM -0700, Jason Stone wrote:
> Oh - I didn't think that truss was either, which lead me to believe that
> someone had gone through ports and fixed a bunch of them.
> whereis truss
truss: /usr/bin/truss /usr/share/man/man1/truss.1.gz /usr/src/usr.bin/truss
> Is someone working on fixing the strace and truss ports yet?
It's not broken, you just need a non-default FreeBSD configuration to use it.
> Are there other popular ports that depend on procfs?
Surely there are other ports that do.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Nate Lawson: "Re: [acpi-jp 2706] Re: Odd ACPI behavior"
- In reply to: Jason Stone: "Re: procfs problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|