Re: jumbograms (& em) & nfs a no go
From: Michal Mertl (mime_at_traveller.cz)
Date: 10/31/03
- Previous message: Bruno Van Den Bossche: "Re: More ULE bugs fixed."
- In reply to: Barney Wolff: "Re: jumbograms (& em) & nfs a no go"
- Next in thread: Terry Lambert: "Re: jumbograms (& em) & nfs a no go"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:13:49 +0100 (CET) To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 08:04:58AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >
> > I've ran many jumbogram tests of machines connected with a cross-over cable
> > and em devices at each end. If you've got a swtch in the middle make sure it
> > does the right thing.
>
> Just a minor note: GigE should not require a crossover cable. It's
> supposed to work to connect two GigE adapters with a straight-thru
> cable. I verified this with two Intel em NICs, quite a while ago.
> As I recall, when I used a crossover cable, I could not get the
> adapters to go to 1000, only 100. That might have been the cable,
> or not.
I can confirm it works equally well with crossover as with straight cable.
-- Michal Mertl _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruno Van Den Bossche: "Re: More ULE bugs fixed."
- In reply to: Barney Wolff: "Re: jumbograms (& em) & nfs a no go"
- Next in thread: Terry Lambert: "Re: jumbograms (& em) & nfs a no go"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]