Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked
From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 11/24/03
- Previous message: David O'Brien: "Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked"
- In reply to: Garrett Wollman: "Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked"
- Next in thread: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:36:30 -0800 To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 03:40:06 -0800, "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> said:
> > We have made the assumption for the first three options since day one.
> > Why should we change the assumptions just because we now have a dynamic
> > /?
>
> Because we are not all masochists.
Why wasn't it enough of a problem to bring up until we went to a dynamic
/? Not having a usable FTP client if your libs are FUBAR'ed isn't new
with dynamic.
Now that it is brought up, where does it end what goes into /rescue?
Having what goes into /rescue bounded only by what is in /[s]bin,
/usr/[s]bin is what worries some of us.
-- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: David O'Brien: "Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked"
- In reply to: Garrett Wollman: "Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked"
- Next in thread: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
