Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

From: Jacques A. Vidrine (nectar_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 11/25/03

  • Next message: Guy Helmer: "RE: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh" 
    Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:22:27 -0600
To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com>

    On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 08:22:52PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote:
    > Yep :).
    >
    > I feel like saying "set the default to static and make the dynamic bins
    > the option" so
    > the people who can't be bothered to compile their own system even
    > though everyone
    > I know does this for tuning purposes anyway can stop whining.
    >
    > But I won't say that.

    I feel we need to pressure to improve the performance of dynamic
    linking. This is not really different from anything else we do in
    -CURRENT: some things we have to throw out there before it is perfect,
    in order to reach critical mass.

    Cheers, 

    -- 
Jacques Vidrine   NTT/Verio SME      FreeBSD UNIX       Heimdal
nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Guy Helmer: "RE: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh"