Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2
From: Alfred Perlstein (bright_at_mu.org)
Date: 12/06/03
- Previous message: Alfred Perlstein: "ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- In reply to: Alfred Perlstein: "ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- Next in thread: KT Sin: "Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- Reply: KT Sin: "Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 05:47:23 -0800 To: current@freebsd.org
Ok, nevermind, I don't see how 'lo' got used instead of 'lo0'
but that's what appears to have caused it.
* Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> [031206 05:43] wrote:
> Sorry if this is a false alarm, but with the "open" firewall
> ruleset in effect:
>
> # ipfw l
> 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo
> 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
> 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
> 65000 allow ip from any to any
> 65535 allow ip from any to any
>
> I can't ping my loopback:
>
> # ping localhost
> PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
> ping: sendto: Permission denied
>
> is this known/expected?
>
>
> --
> - Alfred Perlstein
> - Research Engineering Development Inc.
> - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684
-- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alfred Perlstein: "ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- In reply to: Alfred Perlstein: "ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- Next in thread: KT Sin: "Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- Reply: KT Sin: "Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|