Re: buildworld doesn't like -O2
From: Andreas Hauser (andy-freebsd_at_splashground.de)
Date: 12/11/03
- Previous message: Robin P. Blanchard: "Device bge watchdog timeouts"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: buildworld doesn't like -O2"
- Next in thread: David Taylor: "Re: buildworld doesn't like -O2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 11 Dec 2003 14:38:12 -0000 To: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>
des wrote @ Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:25:08 +0100:
> andy@splashground.de writes:
> > And in this case, as far as i can see, the code does violate the
> > strict aliasing rules.
>
> Yes, and you are welcome to send a patch, but there was none in the
> PR. PRs consisting of nothing but a compiler error message are worse
> than useless.
I see. It just wasn't clear to me from your comment in the PR
wether you considered the code to be a problem at all.
Do you prefer the union version, then please see Andreas Jäger's patch,
or my local version with more varibles and casts, it's rather untested,
or just -fno-strict-aliasing for the offending code parts
or a combination of all of these?
Andy
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Robin P. Blanchard: "Device bge watchdog timeouts"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: buildworld doesn't like -O2"
- Next in thread: David Taylor: "Re: buildworld doesn't like -O2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
