Re: mergemaster feature suggestion...
From: Andy Farkas (andyf_at_speednet.com.au)
Date: 12/22/03
- Previous message: Adam C. Migus: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- In reply to: Richard Coleman: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- Next in thread: Richard Coleman: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- Reply: Richard Coleman: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:30:45 +1000 (EST) To: Richard Coleman <richardcoleman@mindspring.com>
Richard Coleman wrote:
> Well, regardless of what is the official method, it doesn't mean we (as
> developers) need to make life hard for ourselves. There are a couple
> times I would have found such a feature in mergemaster to be useful
> (mainly as a sanity check). It's not a showstopper, just a "nice to have".
I *always* use mergemaster's -v option. It does exactly what I want: tells
me which files currently in /etc that are not part of the new install.
--
:{ andyf@speednet.com.au
Andy Farkas
System Administrator
Speednet Communications
http://www.speednet.com.au/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Adam C. Migus: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- In reply to: Richard Coleman: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- Next in thread: Richard Coleman: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- Reply: Richard Coleman: "Re: mergemaster feature suggestion..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|