Re: Status reports - why not regularly?
From: Colin Percival (colin.percival_at_wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Date: 01/13/04
- Previous message: Matteo Riondato: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:23 +0000 To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav )
At 14:00 13/01/2004, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>You must have missed the part of this thread where I said "we tried
>that before, and it didn't work".
I think we're approaching this issue from the wrong angle. In your
opinion, what -- if anything -- can be asked of developers which would
contribute to the provision of status reports?
Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Matteo Riondato: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: Status reports - why not regularly?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|