Re: DragonflyBSD kernel clock improvements
From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 01/25/04
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: Old SUN NFS performance papers."
- In reply to: Matthew Dillon: "Re: DragonflyBSD kernel clock improvements"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: DragonflyBSD kernel clock improvements"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: DragonflyBSD kernel clock improvements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:45:14 -0700 (MST) To: dillon@apollo.backplane.com
In message: <200401242031.i0OKVD8A037265@apollo.backplane.com>
Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> writes:
: No apic timer. No acpi timer. No TSC garbage. none of that.
We've found at work that while the 8254's timer tends to be the best
universally available time keeping device, it is only as good as the
quarts oscillator driving it. Other time keeping can be more precise.
We've found that systems with APM disabled have a more stable NTP
server when they are running on CPUs with TSC using the TSC
timecounter, but about a factor of 5, mostly due to a reduced jitter
in timestamping the PPS interrupts that we generate. Of course, we
don't care one whit about SMP support for these systems.
Maybe there are better ways to obtain these results. While not
directly releated to the nanosleep work, but just another point of
view.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: Old SUN NFS performance papers."
- In reply to: Matthew Dillon: "Re: DragonflyBSD kernel clock improvements"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: DragonflyBSD kernel clock improvements"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: DragonflyBSD kernel clock improvements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|