Re: [UPDATE] new pid allocation patch
From: Andre Oppermann (andre_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 02/05/04
- Previous message: Matteo Riondato: "Re: ATA still broken"
- In reply to: Jun Su: "[UPDATE] new pid allocation patch (was: Call for testers: New PID allocator patch for -CURRENT)"
- Next in thread: Jun Su: "Re: [UPDATE] new pid allocation patch"
- Reply: Jun Su: "Re: [UPDATE] new pid allocation patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:41:29 +0100 To: Jun Su <junsu@delphij.net>
Jun Su wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> John Baldwin's proc lock commit today made my patch broken, so I have
> revised the patch, and uploaded it to the same position:
> http://www.arbornet.org/~junsu/pid.diff
>
> The revised patch has been improved based on the feedback. Basically,
>
> 1. Added a new sysctl value kern.pidmax to control the current pid range.
> This value can influence the reuse pid period. The initial value is 4096.
This sysctl name looks very misleading to me. Unless the highest PID
I can get here is actually 4096.
> 2. Change the meaning of PID_MAX back to what it was, and sainty-check
> whether the pid is 5 digit based on PID_MAX. (I think it is impossible that
> pid expand PID_MAX for the algorithm nature, though.)
>
> 3. The initial pid table size is bumped from 1<<5 to 1<<7.
-- Andre _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Matteo Riondato: "Re: ATA still broken"
- In reply to: Jun Su: "[UPDATE] new pid allocation patch (was: Call for testers: New PID allocator patch for -CURRENT)"
- Next in thread: Jun Su: "Re: [UPDATE] new pid allocation patch"
- Reply: Jun Su: "Re: [UPDATE] new pid allocation patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
