Re: RFC: doscmd removal
From: Garance A Drosihn (drosih_at_rpi.edu)
Date: 03/15/04
- Previous message: Tim Robbins: "Re: RFC: doscmd removal"
- In reply to: Tim Robbins: "Re: RFC: doscmd removal"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: RFC: doscmd removal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:40:07 -0500 To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
At 2:44 PM +1100 3/15/04, Tim Robbins wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 14, 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>I doubt there will be much of an argument by that time. AMD and
>Intel have already decided that V86 mode is not worth the effort
>to implement fully on their 64-bit CPUs - anyone who wants to use
>V86 mode (and therefore doscmd) has to run them in 32-bit mode.
So you are not saying that 'doscmd' is universally broken, so much
as FreeBSD is now running on more hardware platforms where doscmd
serves no purpose?
(disclaimer: I don't care whether doscmd stays in the base, or if
it becomes a i386-only port. I'm just wondering why it came up as
a topic right now...).
-- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Tim Robbins: "Re: RFC: doscmd removal"
- In reply to: Tim Robbins: "Re: RFC: doscmd removal"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: RFC: doscmd removal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]