Re: performance of jailed processes
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 03/30/04
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:52:01 +0200
Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> writes:
> Somewhat more painful suggestion, but could you generate ktraces against a
> mysql client doing the query inside and out of jail, then using whatever
> flag sets relative timestamps on kdump, diff the two and see where the
> substantial differences begin?
I'll give it a shot tomorrow.
> 13 seconds is too long for most of the potential things I have in mind...
although the query only returns one row, it's a pretty big row, so 13
seconds could be explained by per-syscall or per-packet overhead.
DES
-- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|