Re: performance of jailed processes
From: Bernd Walter (ticso_at_cicely12.cicely.de)
Date: 03/31/04
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Comments: pflog rc.d-script"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "performance of jailed processes"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:21:29 +0200 To: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 06:58:28PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Can anyone explain why jailed processes seem to perform much worse
> than non-jailed processes in recent -CURRENT?
>
> Specifically, running a query against a remote MySQL server from
> inside a jail takes an order of magnitude more time than from outside
> the jail. Tcpdump shows that the TCP packets carrying the result are
> evenly spaced, so this is not a matter of the server timing out on a
> DNS lookup or anything like that.
>
> Running a configure script also takes much longer inside the jail than
> outisde, and again, progress is even (though slow), so it is clearly
> not a matter of DNS timing out.
Do the jails all have the same malloc.conf as the base system?
-- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Comments: pflog rc.d-script"
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "performance of jailed processes"
- Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: performance of jailed processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|