Re: 4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 05/04/04
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "wmnet-1.2 broken by if_poll_slowq"
- In reply to: Gerrit Nagelhout: "4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: 4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: 4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 13:06:57 -0700 To: Gerrit Nagelhout <gnagelhout@sandvine.com>
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:55:32PM -0400, Gerrit Nagelhout wrote:
> I would like to move to CURRENT for new hardware support, and the
> ability to properly use multi-threading in user-space, but can't do
> this until the performance bottlenecks are solved. I realize that
> 5.x is still a work in progress and hasn't been tuned as well as 4.7
> yet, but are there any plans for optimizations in this area? Does
> anyone have any suggestions on what else I can try?
Try rwatson's netperf patches:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/
There is at least one outstanding panic condition known, but more
testing will be a great help.
Kris
P.S. You didn't mention the status of WITNESS, but I'm assuming you
read the docs and disabled it since it's a huge performance killer.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "wmnet-1.2 broken by if_poll_slowq"
- In reply to: Gerrit Nagelhout: "4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: 4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: 4.7 vs 5.2.1 SMP/UP bridging performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]