Re: Softupdates a mount option?

From: Cyrille Lefevre (clefevre-lists_at_9online.fr)
Date: 05/26/04

  • Next message: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64" 
    To: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@fer.hr>, <current@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 23:28:51 +0200

    "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@fer.hr> wrote:
    > This has been really nagging me for a long time: Why aren't softupdates made
    > a mount option (like 'sync' and 'async')? Do I remember correctly that it is
    > done so in NetBSD (where it's called softdeps), so it's doable?

    take a look at this thread :
    http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=920087+0+archive/2000/freebsd-current/20000625.freebsd-current

    Cyrille Lefevre. 

    -- 
home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Softupdates a mount option?
      ... > This has been really nagging me for a long time: Why aren't softupdates ... > that it is done so in NetBSD (where it's called softdeps), ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Softupdates a mount option?
      ... This has been really nagging me for a long time: Why aren't softupdates made ... a mount option (like 'sync' and 'async')? ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Errno man page
      ... Ivan Voras wrote: ... Somebody supplied a patch but it ... NetBSD and OpenBSD both have the correct values as ...
      (freebsd-current)