RE: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compatheaded for history)
From: Will Saxon (WillS_at_housing.ufl.edu)
Date: 06/29/04
- Previous message: Dan Nelson: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history)"
- Next in thread: Lukas Ertl: "RE: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4compatheaded for history)"
- Reply: Lukas Ertl: "RE: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4compatheaded for history)"
- Reply: Dan Nelson: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compatheaded for history)"
- Reply: Matthias Schuendehuette: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:38:32 -0400 To: <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
> > I once polled users to get feedback about the demand for a BSD
> > client. Although I thought I got impressive numbers, the "offer" we
> > received was a joke (they would have charged 125,000 EUR
> for the port
> > of a 5.x client, support for this client would have cost another
> > 25000 EUR and there would have been no updates to future versions).
> >
> > However, if you would like to make another attempt, I can send you
> > the E-Mail responses I have collected so far, to show them, that
> > there is some demand.
>
> Casually mention that Veritas NetBackup supports FreeBSD and you were
> wondering what the migration path might be :)
It does? Under Linux emu I guess?
Their product literature doesn't seem to claim it, so I never really
looked at it. I suspect there are a lot of folks like me who do the
same thing - making it difficult to really gauge demand. I know I would
sure like a native version of 'DB2 Connect' for FreeBSD, but the numbers
quoted above sound about like the numbers quoted when someone asked about
DB2 connect a year or two ago.
-Will
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dan Nelson: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history)"
- Next in thread: Lukas Ertl: "RE: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4compatheaded for history)"
- Reply: Lukas Ertl: "RE: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4compatheaded for history)"
- Reply: Dan Nelson: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compatheaded for history)"
- Reply: Matthias Schuendehuette: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|