Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headedfor history)
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 06/30/04
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: kern/68442: panic - acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "sleepq chain""
- In reply to: Tim Robbins: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headedfor history)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Lang: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:39:26 +0000 To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:37:24PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:56:40PM -0500, Paul Seniura wrote:
>
> > I google'd and didn't like what I saw. Stuff about
> > nullfs not being too kosher on -Current. :(
>
> There seems to be a lot of superstition surrounding nullfs, but I only
> know of one outstanding reproducible problem with it in -current (sockets
> and fifos aren't handled correctly and cause panics.) If you can spare the
> time to experiment, I suggest trying it, then filing a PR if you encounter
> any problems. There's no guarantee that these problems will be addressed
> right away, but it will give others more solid information than rumours
> to go by when deciding whether or not to use nullfs, and well-documented
> problems are much more likely to get fixed.
FYI, I use read-only nullfs extensively for package builds (with a
static lower layer, and no sockets or fifos in either layer). I
haven't had any problems with it.
Kris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: kern/68442: panic - acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "sleepq chain""
- In reply to: Tim Robbins: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headedfor history)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Lang: "Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]