Re: TEST/REVIEW: minor improvement to linux-o-lator
From: David Malone (dwmalone_at_maths.tcd.ie)
Date: 06/30/04
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Re: "user/group _pflogd:_pflogd" what's with the _ ?"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: TEST/REVIEW: minor improvement to linux-o-lator"
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: TEST/REVIEW: minor improvement to linux-o-lator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:05:06 +0100 To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:47:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> And here is the correct patch file :-)
> the first one was the initial editing result.
Looks OK to me, though I wonder if both of these calls should have
been using linux_to_bsd_msg_flags() on the flags.
David.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Re: "user/group _pflogd:_pflogd" what's with the _ ?"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: TEST/REVIEW: minor improvement to linux-o-lator"
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: TEST/REVIEW: minor improvement to linux-o-lator"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]