Re: panic: m_copym, length > size of mbuf chain
From: Daniel Lang (dl_at_leo.org)
Date: 07/13/04
- Previous message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: panic: m_copym, length > size of mbuf chain"
- Next in thread: Don Lewis: "Re: panic: m_copym, length > size of mbuf chain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:05:08 +0200 To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Hi Robert,
Robert Watson wrote on Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:42:09PM -0400:
[..]
> Is it possible to get the box running with SACK again for debugging
> purposes? Resolving this issue would be a very good thing. Thanks!
[..]
Well....
I am really hesitant about this matter.
The box used to be (at least from my perspective) one of the
top 5 mirror hosts in Germany for more than a dozen public domain
projects, like FreeBSD, other BSDs, Apache, Postgres, a couple of
Linux distros and many more. All in all this box has 100-200
mirrors running (well if they are running).
So at the moment, I am really glad to have the thing up again.
However, somebody of the SACK development team has contacted me, to
obtain access to the crashdump and I am happy to provide this
access. Maybe this is already sufficient to resolve the problem.
So, I will provide access to this data, and we will see if these
people can find the problem. If not, well, I am still open to
suggestions. It all depends, I'd say.
I am very glad and thank everybody who helped to solve my
problem, and I am still willing to contribute my share.
One of the major obstacles is, that I am (actually starting from today)
no longer an employee at the Technische Universitaet Muenchen,
the university running the LEO project (where the machine is hosted).
So I for the sake of the transition, I have had a strong interest in
leaving a stable service to be hosted by my collegues and successors.
The instability problem in the last weeks has caused a really really
bad headache.
So if things are settled down and there is someone who has equal
competencies in running the LEO services, I am confident more thorough
debugging assitancy can be provided. To make things clear, I volunteered
to assist the LEO project in the future, but I cannot promise anything
right now, so I would like to keep the impact to the production service
as minimal as possible.
Thanks and best regards,
Daniel
-- IRCnet: Mr-Spock - Burn them to ashes, then burn the ashes. - Daniel Lang * dl@leo.org * +49 89 289 18532 * http://www.leo.org/~dl/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: panic: m_copym, length > size of mbuf chain"
- Next in thread: Don Lewis: "Re: panic: m_copym, length > size of mbuf chain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|