Re: SIO Interrupt storms and unhandled interrupts
From: John Baldwin (jhb_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/10/04
- Previous message: Matthew Jacob: "Re: PANIC: sym(4) didn't MODULE_DEPEND cam(4)."
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: SIO Interrupt storms and unhandled interrupts"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: SIO Interrupt storms and unhandled interrupts"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: SIO Interrupt storms and unhandled interrupts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:07:11 -0400
On Thursday 09 September 2004 05:41 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <6.1.2.0.0.20040909154407.08b1a9f8@64.7.153.2>
>
> Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> writes:
> : Thanks for the response! We found a different solution /
> : approach which seems to work on both RELENG_4 and RELENG_5. The problem
> : is that the modem is not being seen as a PCI / PUC device and instead is
> : being seen as an ISA SIO device ?? The following RELENG_5 and RELENG_4
> : patches seem to fix the problem. I wonder if the other modems listed in
> : sio.c suffer the same fate ?
> :
> : Also fixed in this are those "cant re-use leafs" at bootup time. The
> : modem is seen as a PUC device now.... At the bottom is a diff between
> : the boot -v
>
> I like this fix! I'll see if I can find to commit it.
Note that hacking sio to not use INTR_FAST would have had the same result.
Note that in his dmesg diff, sio4 has to fall back to normal interrupt mode.
-- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Matthew Jacob: "Re: PANIC: sym(4) didn't MODULE_DEPEND cam(4)."
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: SIO Interrupt storms and unhandled interrupts"
- Next in thread: Mike Tancsa: "Re: SIO Interrupt storms and unhandled interrupts"
- Reply: Mike Tancsa: "Re: SIO Interrupt storms and unhandled interrupts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|