Re: panic: sorele
From: Evren Yurtesen (yurtesen_at_ispro.net.tr)
Date: 09/29/04
- Previous message: Sean McNeil: "bind9: cannot stop/start it"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Re: panic: sorele"
- Next in thread: Evren Yurtesen: "? witness_get: witness exhausted ? Re(4): panic: sorele"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:37:24 -0700 To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 September 2004 06:57 am, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
>
>>John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday 27 September 2004 09:34 pm, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
>>>
>>>>Robert Watson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Evren Yurtesen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Does anybody know what is panic: sorele? :)
>>>>>
>>>>>It's the result of an inconsistency detected by the kernel regarding
>>>>>kernel invariants for sockets. The somewhat uninformative nature of the
>>>>>message is historical, and should probably be fixed. If this is
>>>>>reproduceable, could you rebuild your kernel with INVARIANTS support, as
>>>>>well as DDB so you can generate a stack trace and other debugging
>>>>>information (or, if you have a core, could you use gdb to extract
>>>>>debugging information per the Handbook?)
>>>>
>>>>I am not able to compile the kernel with DDB and INVARIANTS either...
>>>>When I put these options to kernel conf, I get this error
>>>>
>>>>Options Added:
>>>>
>>>>options INVARIANTS
>>>>options KDB
>>>>options DDB
>>>
>>>INVARIANTS requires the option 'INVARIANT_SUPPORT'.
>>
>>Good point, one sometimes wonders why options INVARIANTS doesnt
>>automatically include options INVARIANT_SUPPORT :)
>
>
> So you can build a kernel with INVARIANT_SUPPORT but no INVARIANTS but still
> build modules with INVARIANTS. Useful when working on a device driver for
> example. I think the dependency there is noted in sys/conf/NOTES btw.
Yes, probably, but it was just a suggestion, because DDB said that it
needs KDB to compile :) but INVARIANTS just stopped compiling with an
error so I couldnt guess what was the problem. The error could be more
informative maybe?
Just a cosmetic thing though. Nothing vital. But I guess there is a real
problem about this panic: sorele when the kernel is compiled with SMP
support. If this happens again and I cant get a kernel dump or
something, I will compile my kernel without SMP... since I dont even
have multiple processors, I was just testing hyperthreading...
Evren
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Sean McNeil: "bind9: cannot stop/start it"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Re: panic: sorele"
- Next in thread: Evren Yurtesen: "? witness_get: witness exhausted ? Re(4): panic: sorele"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
