Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?

• Previous message: Thomas Quinot: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• In reply to: Thomas Quinot: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• Next in thread: george 'blackass' graham: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• Reply: george 'blackass' graham: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:11:06 +0100 (BST)
To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Søren" Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk>

Me too.

Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:* Søren Schmidt, 2004-10-19 :

> Well, if we need to go the newbus way, we need to do it completely, ie
> get the ATA devices etc tied in that way as well.

I agree that this would be nice, but I do not see it as a prerequisite
to modularizing atapicam.

> know there has been a couble of others looking into this, so now is the
> time to chime in if thats the case.

Where are we standing with this effort? Who is working on it currently,
and what has been implemented already?

Thomas.

-- 
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
		
---------------------------------
 ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

• Previous message: Thomas Quinot: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• In reply to: Thomas Quinot: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• Next in thread: george 'blackass' graham: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• Reply: george 'blackass' graham: "Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]