Re: EHCI considered harmful?

From: Michael Nottebrock (michaelnottebrock_at_gmx.net)
Date: 10/29/04

  • Next message: Jack Twilley: "Re: who is test Intel PRO/Wireless 2100/2200BG/2915ABG?" 
    To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:46:29 +0200

    On Friday, 29. October 2004 20:29, Mike Tancsa wrote:

    > I think EHCI would only make it worse.

    Yes.

    > The same 1.1 bugs would be there
    > that you mention, and then the ones added by EHCI. i.e. it doesnt take any
    > 1.1 bugs away, just adds more.

    Exactly. And I still say it should go in. And you should file a PR about your
    ehci issues (oh, yeah, and we need USB maintainers to take them, too :(). 

    -- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

  • Next message: Jack Twilley: "Re: who is test Intel PRO/Wireless 2100/2200BG/2915ABG?"