Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]
Alexander_at_Leidinger.net
Date: 11/12/04
- Previous message: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: [kde-freebsd] Problems with kdeutils dependencies."
- In reply to: Harti Brandt: "Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]"
- Next in thread: Harti Brandt: "Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]"
- Reply: Harti Brandt: "Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:54:57 +0100 To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
Zitat von Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>:
> PK>>If yes: we have some ports which aren't -j safe, so this would violate
> PK>>POLA.
> PK>
> PK>That is what "make -B" is for.
>
> Or .NOTPARALLEL
I'm not talking about /usr/ports/category/port/Makefile, I'm talking about
/usr/ports/category/port/work/tarball_dir/**/Makefile. We don't have
control about those Makefiles.
As much as I like a flag in the Makefile of a port which indicates
that a port can't be build with -j, we don't have this and the last time
this topic was discussed there was a strong objection to something like
this.
So this change may break procedures which worked so far.
Bye,
Alexander.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: [kde-freebsd] Problems with kdeutils dependencies."
- In reply to: Harti Brandt: "Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]"
- Next in thread: Harti Brandt: "Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]"
- Reply: Harti Brandt: "Re: [TEST] make -j patch [take 2]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|