Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs"
From: Daniel O'Connor (doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au)
Date: 11/13/04
- Previous message: Daniel O'Connor: "Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs""
- In reply to: Peter Wemm: "Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs""
- Next in thread: Clint Olsen: "Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:19:02 +1030
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:09, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Try something less CPU intensive like /dev/zero :)
>
> I think he was saying he created a 1GB file from the contents
> of /dev/urandom and then timed the transfer of this over 100Mbit/sec
> link.
Ahh fair enough.. I wasn't sure.
> Anyway, the point was that it worked! Could the problem with the K8V SE
> really be as simple as we've been hardcoding 128K of ram for a device
> that only has 64K?
Yes.. good point :)
I have a similarly affected device, but I won't be able to test it until
Monday (no cable connected to the card, but I added a printf for the RAM
size)
-- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Daniel O'Connor: "Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs""
- In reply to: Peter Wemm: "Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs""
- Next in thread: Clint Olsen: "Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|