Re: Yes it did the trick - Re[3]: Re[2]: em0, VLAN and bpf(?) trouble w/RELENG_5
From: Lenar D. Tukhvatullin (blackv_at_netroad.ru)
Date: 11/13/04
- Previous message: Don Lewis: "Re: kernel panic in free() called from semop()"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Yes it did the trick - Re[3]: Re[2]: em0, VLAN and bpf(?) trouble w/RELENG_5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:21:03 +0300 To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:05:30PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I am able to create and use VLANS and putting the nic or the vlan interface
> into promisc mode does not break the passing of packets.
And what about bridging?
Can you test bridging beetween vlan and another physical interface,
for example:
em1 - another physical interface, not connected to wire
172.16.0.0/24 - network in vlan (tag 100)
172.16.0.1 - remote host in this vlan
# ifconfig em0 up
# ifconfig vlan0 create
# ifconfig vlan0 vlan 100 vlandev em0
# ifconfig vlan0 up
# ifconfig em1 172.16.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
# kldload bridge
# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge.config="vlan0 em1"
# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
Pinging remote host:
$ ping 172.16.0.1
-- Lenar D. Tukhvatullin _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Don Lewis: "Re: kernel panic in free() called from semop()"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "Re: Yes it did the trick - Re[3]: Re[2]: em0, VLAN and bpf(?) trouble w/RELENG_5"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
