Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Previous message: Scott Long: "Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?"
- In reply to: Scott Long: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:01:15 -0700 (MST) To: scottl@FreeBSD.org
In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?
Most likely historical inertia... No body noticed until that module
build got more facist.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Scott Long: "Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?"
- In reply to: Scott Long: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|