Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
From: Doug White (dwhite_at_gumbysoft.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Previous message: Doug White: "Re: ACPI errors"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:07:02 -0800 (PST) To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20050130073248.W20417@pooker.samsco.org>
> Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> : Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?
>
> Most likely historical inertia... No body noticed until that module
> build got more facist.
The digi driver in HEAD is completely inoperative anyway, so removing it
from the kernel config wouldn't hurt anyone, for the time being.
(There's a PR with a fixed driver I'm trying to find time to test...)
-- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Doug White: "Re: ACPI errors"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Reply: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]