Re: pcre in base system

From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 02/17/05

  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: newfs limits? 10TB filesystem max?"
    Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:48:12 -0800
    To: Sergey Lyubka <valenok@gmail.com>
    
    

    On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:37:14PM +0000, Sergey Lyubka wrote:
    > So it will.
    > If regex(3) will be decoupled from libc, one can remap
    > libregex to pcre, for example.
    >
    > > > greater reliance on ports. An interesting approach could be to
    > > > break out regex(3) from libc and allow base utilities to use shared
    > > > libraries from ports - this would allow someone to install the pcre
    > > > port and have the base sed(1) use it.
    > >
    > > Uh, no. /usr/src should be self-contained.

    DON'T TOP POST.

    -- 
    -- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: newfs limits? 10TB filesystem max?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: pcre in base system
      ... > If regexwill be decoupled from libc, one can remap ... > libregex to pcre, for example. ... That would mean documenting functionality you only get ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: pcre in base system
      ... If regexwill be decoupled from libc, one can remap ... libregex to pcre, for example. ... To unsubscribe, ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Standard C Library regex performance issue
      ... able to find the answer for the question "why is Unix's regex from ... libc so slow". ... PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expression) library (which is btw ...
      (comp.lang.c)