Re: Wpa, dhcp and default routes...

From: Sam Leffler (sam_at_errno.com)
Date: 02/27/05

  • Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98" 
    Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:12:22 -0800
To: Jochen Gensch <incmc@gmx.de>

    Jochen Gensch wrote:
    > Sam Leffler wrote:
    >
    >> I think I recall seeing this. I mostly use minipci cards so don't
    >> experience this. I'll check on it.
    >
    >
    > Thanks!
    >
    >
    >> I've not seen that however I mostly use a port of the openbsd dhclient
    >> that's been modified to understand 802.11 msgs through the routing
    >> socket. Unfortunately I've got no time to shepherd this work into the
    >> tree and noone responded to my request for help in the last status report
    >
    >
    > Is that port available for FreeBSD?

    No, I've been looking for a committer to shepherd the work into the
    tree. In particular I am concerned about the potential fallout in
    changing from a single instance of dhclient to having one per/interface.

    > Mmh, but why isn't the option -i for
    > periodical polling working?
    >
    >> Yes, this is a pain with the current dhclient. I believe it's
    >> resolved with the new dhclient hook scripts.
    >
    >
    > Could you geive me a bit more information on that? What hook scripts and
    > when / where could I test them? But why is setting up a corret route an
    > dhclient issue?

    http://perforce.freebsd.org/depotTreeBrowser.cgi?FSPC=//depot/projects/wifi&HIDEDEL=NO

            Sam
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98"