Re: [TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 03/10/05
- Previous message: Andrey Chernov: "Re: [TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix"
- In reply to: Andrey Chernov: "Re: [TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix"
- Next in thread: F. Senault: "Re: [TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:00:33 +0100
In message <20050310065126.GA28001@nagual.pp.ru>, Andrey Chernov writes:
>On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:32:39AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> There is no risk of collision, look at what devfs_random() does.
>
>What happens with whole devfs_random() logic, in case first devfs_seed
>obtained after masking with 0xf0f becomes 0 again (as it was before)? And
>second? And third? It may happens especially in some "no good entropy yet"
>scenario.
Then somebody beats our PRNG maintainers over the head until they get
their act together.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andrey Chernov: "Re: [TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix"
- In reply to: Andrey Chernov: "Re: [TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix"
- Next in thread: F. Senault: "Re: [TEST(/review)] major/minor/devname fix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|