Re: Using cpufreq
From: Alexander S. Usov (A.S.Usov_at_kvi.nl)
Date: 03/13/05
- Previous message: Philippe PEGON: "Re: Panic with amr and 5.4-PRERELEASE"
- In reply to: Xavier Maillard: "Re: Using cpufreq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:50:05 +0100
Xavier Maillard wrote:
> What do you use as you supfile ? (default tag)
RELENG_5
> Here I am using -CURRENT maybe cpufreq has not hit -STABLE.
I decided to give it a try after seeng this in UPDATEING:
20050225:
The cpufreq framework has been merged. As part of this, the sysctls
for acpi(4) throttling have been removed. See cpufreq(4) for the
new sysctl interface. The power_profile script has also been updated,
so you can use performance/economy_cpu_freq in rc.conf(5) to set AC
on/offline cpu frequencies. No new cpufreq drivers have been brought
in with this import but drivers from -current can now be built and run
on -stable.
It looks that the last sentence is a bit incorrect, and should be read as
"No cpufreq drivers have ......"
-- Best regards, Alexander. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Philippe PEGON: "Re: Panic with amr and 5.4-PRERELEASE"
- In reply to: Xavier Maillard: "Re: Using cpufreq"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]