Re: ATAPICAM Problem
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des_at_des.no)
Date: 03/27/05
- Previous message: Rong-En Fan: "if_wi_pccard.c build failed"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Re: ATAPICAM Problem"
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: ATAPICAM Problem"
- Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: ATAPICAM Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:10:41 +0200 To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Note that many developers tend to only use the config / make depend / make
> method as it is more natural if you are working on the kernel. make
> buildkernel is better suited for users on non-development machines however.
'make buildkernel' works just fine for developers. It's just a matter
of habit, and of knowing how to use NO_KERNELCLEAN, NO_KERNELDEPEND,
and MODULES_OVERRIDE.
DES
-- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Rong-En Fan: "if_wi_pccard.c build failed"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Re: ATAPICAM Problem"
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: ATAPICAM Problem"
- Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: ATAPICAM Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|