Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ?
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 03/28/05
- Previous message: David O'Brien: "Re: code requirements / CVS server"
- In reply to: Scott: "Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ?"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ?"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Scott <scottl@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:26:30 +0200
In message <42481C66.7090409@samsco.org>, Scott writes:
>So are you saying that an async notification mechanism needs to be
>invented for SCSI, or that all SCSI users should be required to use
>SES or SAFTE enclosures for all SCSI devices, or that we should be like
>Windows and constantly poll the devices?
I don't care _how_ we make CAM/SCSI behave like the users expect.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: David O'Brien: "Re: code requirements / CVS server"
- In reply to: Scott: "Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ?"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ?"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
