Re: incorrect statement on www page

From: Mark Linimon (linimon_at_lonesome.com)
Date: 04/29/05

  • Next message: Qing Li: "FW: pmtu patch" 
    Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:33:48 -0500 (CDT)
To: Jonathan Gray <jsg@goblin.cx>

    On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jonathan Gray wrote:

    > If these binary only components come with FreeBSD they are part
    > of FreeBSD as far as most people are concerned. There are binary
    > components with no publically available source code in FreeBSD,
    > so it is not full source code.
    >
    > Additionally supporting such things hinders progress on acceptable
    > alternatives be they drivers with full source or use of other vendors.

    There are two ways I can see to proceed on this.

    1. The project can change the offending text to be a link to a separate
    page that contains a paragraph, or paragraphs, about what is included
    in source vs binary form and the philosophical reasons that we have
    chosen to include the binaries (e.g. that otherwise some hardware that
    people have already purchased will not operate). This text could
    include an explanation of why no one in open source feels that this
    development is optimal, and a disclaimer that sometimes expedience
    dictates such things.

    2. The project could leave the offending text as it is and get on doing
    what it does best, e.g. writing software and fixing bugs, instead of
    writing philosophical treatises.

    I think everyone reading this can figure out which I think is the
    better solution. And if that means that we lose a few users who can't
    deal with the binary blobs being there to, for instance, Debian or
    OpenBSD (who seem more concerned with such philosophical deliberations),
    well, fine.

    In the meantime there are plenty of substantive problems to work on that
    we stand a chance of resolving to everyone's satisfaction. IMHO this
    isn't one of them.

    mcl

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Qing Li: "FW: pmtu patch"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: bruteforce
      ... I forgot to mention that pf is also available on FreeBSD too. ... Adam Stroud wrote: ... offending IP address using pf and it seems to work well for me. ... It comes with examples that block brute force efforts, ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: Older versions of FreeBSD
      ... [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] ... Single line paragraph. ... > I am looking for older versions of FreeBSD. ... If you're interested in them for academic reasons, ...
      (freebsd-questions)