Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all...
From: Ruslan Ermilov (ru_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 06/10/05
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Next in thread: David O'Brien: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:47:06 +0300 To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:32:14AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > And if you feel that -fno-strict-aliasing is evil, why not dike it
> > out from sys.mk?
>
> 'ncvs annotate /usr/src/share/mk/sys/mk | grep aliasing' and you'll
> realize that any attempt to touch it would result in a huge flamewar.
>
I don't see a flamewar, only the mention that it breaks some notable
ports. If it's not suitable for ports, then we should invent a mean
to compile only src/ *without* -fno-strict-aliasing.
Cheers,
-- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Next in thread: David O'Brien: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]