Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all...
From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 06/13/05
- Previous message: Justin T. Gibbs: "Re: Accessing SCSI-Devices >2TB"
- In reply to: Mark Linimon: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Next in thread: Björn König: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Reply: Björn König: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:56:18 -0700 To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 11:24:06PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I tried. But Kris refused to consider the following for committing.
> > The problem is something like 3 ports will not build with
> > "-fno-strict-aliasing". Those are the gcc28, gnat[*] ports.
> >
> > [*] I really don't understand why we have a GCC 2.8 based Ada compiler
> > when Ada has been a native part of GCC since version 3.1...
>
> If these ports are useless, why don't we mark them DEPRECATED and
> after a decent interval, get rid of them?
>
> In this day and age, anyone who's on gcc27 or gcc28 is hopelessly
> behind anyways.
I could say that about tons of other ports. The gcc28 port works fine,
and I don't see what is wrong with the patch I supplied. gcc28 is still
the fastest compiler (in terms of compiler speed) we have on FreeBSD. It
is still useful.
-- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Justin T. Gibbs: "Re: Accessing SCSI-Devices >2TB"
- In reply to: Mark Linimon: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Next in thread: Björn König: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Reply: Björn König: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|