Re: [current tinderbox] failure on ...all...

From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 06/13/05

  • Next message: Polakov Alexander: "Re: cannot build anything big" 
    Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 01:41:49 -0700
To: Björn König <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>

    On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:19:36AM +0200, Bjrn Knig wrote:
    > David O'Brien wrote:
    > >I could say that about tons of other ports. The gcc28 port works fine,
    > >and I don't see what is wrong with the patch I supplied. gcc28 is still
    > >the fastest compiler (in terms of compiler speed) we have on FreeBSD. It
    > >is still useful.
    >
    > For what is it useful? It can't compile C++ code,

    Funny for me, I just compiled some C++ code (using catch-throw)
    exceptions and it ran fine.

    > it has a lack of
    > standard conformance, gcc295 isn't quite worse and the utility ccache is
    > a good choice you if you need fast recompilation.

    Then for you, use gcc295. But there is C++ code and C code that gcc295
    won't compile. That is why I keep gcc28 around. I don't see why the
    existence of gcc28 is a hardship for you. I've even set NO_CDROM to not
    be a burden for you. It builds in 1 minute 30 seconds on my machine, so
    its not a burden on the package cluster either.
      

    -- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Polakov Alexander: "Re: cannot build anything big"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: The origins of CL conditions system
      ... that it may be good to let the user steer the behavior of the program. ... C++ exceptions took, to try and reconstruct what might've been going ... making compiled code and interpreted code work way ... trying to lexically compile your web server and client together so you ...
      (comp.lang.lisp)
    • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
      ... was the main reason for C++'s initial success. ... C is not a subset of C++ with minor exceptions. ... Rename all of the .c files to .cpp and try to compile it. ... The changes from C to C++ are more drastic than from Fortran IV to ...
      (comp.lang.c)
    • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
      ... was the main reason for C++'s initial success. ... C is not a subset of C++ with minor exceptions. ... Rename all of the .c files to .cpp and try to compile it. ... The changes from C to C++ are more drastic than from Fortran IV to ...
      (comp.lang.c)
    • Re: Is necessary to switch to C++ or some object-oriented language?
      ... It's very rare for programs ... to need to call mainrecursively, or to care about the type of a ... Rename all of the .c files to .cpp and try to compile it. ... exceptions are widely used, ...
      (comp.lang.c)
    • Re: Destroy the parent of the control
      ... all exceptions to break into the VC debugger, ... VB IDE and compile. ... Microsoft MVP, MCSD ...
      (microsoft.public.vc.atl)