Re: new panics
From: Thierry Herbelot (thierry_at_herbelot.com)
Date: 06/24/05
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: 6.0-current panic: loading radeon module"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: new panics"
- Next in thread: Thierry Herbelot: "Re: new panics"
- Reply: Thierry Herbelot: "Re: new panics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 23:31:45 +0200
Le Friday 24 June 2005 22:56, Mike Silbersack a écrit :
>
> That makes some sense, because we may not be getting around to the
> modified memory until we hit some heavy memory usage. Also, one backtrace
> showed the panic happening when uma_reclaim was called from the vm pageout
> daemon. Sounds like I should throw something in to (optionally) call
> uma_reclaim on a regular basis so that we might catch this more quickly.
some light coming into the debate !
my test machine is somewhat low on memory (128Megs) and is used "headless", so
the memory could only become rare somewhat late in the buildworld process.
cheers,
TfH
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: 6.0-current panic: loading radeon module"
- In reply to: Mike Silbersack: "Re: new panics"
- Next in thread: Thierry Herbelot: "Re: new panics"
- Reply: Thierry Herbelot: "Re: new panics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|