Re: new panics
From: Mike Silbersack (silby_at_silby.com)
Date: 06/25/05
- Previous message: KAYVEN RIESE: "Re: Timekeeping hosed by factor 3, high lapic[01] interrupt rates"
- In reply to: Andrey Chernov: "Re: new panics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:59:38 -0500 (CDT) To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 03:01:34PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>>
>> The Memory modified after free panics you guys have reported are
>> unfortunately not pinpointing where the error occured, they're just
>> pinpointing where the error was detected. :)
>
> Could you "tag" mbuf somehow to show later (at the panic) from where it
> comes from?
>
> --
> http://ache.pp.ru/
Yes I can, I'm going to try to work on that tonight, if I have time - if
not, then I'll work on it tomorrow.
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: KAYVEN RIESE: "Re: Timekeeping hosed by factor 3, high lapic[01] interrupt rates"
- In reply to: Andrey Chernov: "Re: new panics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
