Re: location of bioq lock
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 07/15/05
- Previous message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- In reply to: Scott Long: "Re: location of bioq lock"
- Next in thread: Luigi Rizzo: "Re: location of bioq lock"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:57:00 +0200
In message <42D75B84.7090601@samsco.org>, Scott Long writes:
>I agree. The 'side queue' can be a bioq also that gets handed off in
>whole to the driver once the path is unfrozen, but that's an
>optimization that is best done at a later time.
It's hardly worth the effort I think.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
- In reply to: Scott Long: "Re: location of bioq lock"
- Next in thread: Luigi Rizzo: "Re: location of bioq lock"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|