Re: 6.0BETA3 panic in ip_output (vlan/RIP related?)
From: Robert Watson (rwatson_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/06/05
- Previous message: Giorgos Keramidas: "Re: moused related panic"
- Maybe in reply to: Gavin Atkinson: "Re: 6.0BETA3 panic in ip_output (vlan/RIP related?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:00:31 +0100 (BST) To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> So it sounds like we need to figure out how the multicast code should
>> behave on interface removal -- I wonder what other operating systems do
>> here? Do they simply invalidate current membership related with the
>> interface, or do they leave the multicast sockets in a state such that
>> if the interface comes back, the memberships are re-bound?
>
> In the case of a non-local multicast sessions, the saved multicast
> socket state would need to keep a timestamp of the last a multicast
> router IGMP session probe to detect the possibility of session pruning.
I was assuming that, at the very least, it would be necessary to issue a
new IGMP join when binding the socket to a new interface...
Robert N M Watson
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Giorgos Keramidas: "Re: moused related panic"
- Maybe in reply to: Gavin Atkinson: "Re: 6.0BETA3 panic in ip_output (vlan/RIP related?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
