Re: 6.0 and "options PREEMPTION"
From: Doug Poland (doug_at_polands.org)
Date: 10/28/05
- Previous message: Felipe openglx: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: 6.0 and "options PREEMPTION""
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 6.0 and "options PREEMPTION""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 08:56:38 -0500 To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 02:04:37PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Doug Poland wrote:
>
> > One of the other nice benefits to the SMPVFS work is that with our
> > fully preemptive 6.x kernel, not holding the Giant lock over the
> > file system code lets the file system code not only preempt lower
> > precedence kernel threads, such as background crypto operations or
> > file system operations, but be preempted by more timing critical
> > code, such as sound card interrupts, network I/O, and so on.
> >
> >Does this mean that options PREEMPTION is assumed in 6.0? If not,
> >could someone explain or point me to some docs that will help me
> >understand.
>
> In FreeBSD 6.0 and higher, options PREEMPTION appears in the default
> kernel configuration (GENERIC).
>
Thank you
> When upgrading from earlier revisions, if you keep the same config
> file, you'll need to add it manually. With the advent of "include"
> support in newer FreeBSD versions, I find I generally have my own
> include file include GENERIC, then add nodevice/nooptions to remove
> things I don't want, and device/options to add things I do want. The
>
I've been using the include technique for some time but was unaware of
nodevice/nooptions. Sounds cleaner that commenting out unwanted devices
and options.
-- Regards, Doug _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Felipe openglx: "Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: 6.0 and "options PREEMPTION""
- Next in thread: Kris Kennaway: "Re: 6.0 and "options PREEMPTION""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]