Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?
From: Steve Kargl (sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Date: 10/29/05
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:34:36 -0700 To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 04:28:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 04:22:10PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > Build world is consistly 6% slower running an amd64 world than an
> > i386 world.
> >
> > In both cases, I'm using the default install of 6.0 RC-1 on the same
> > AMD 64 3000+ with 1GB of RAM. I'm finding that build world takes 48
> > minutes under i386 and 51 minutes under amd64.
> >
> > Is this expected?
>
> You're comparing two different things (different compilers, some
> amount of different code being compiled), so you shouldn't expect them
> to be the same.
>
He also may be building lib32 on amd64.
-- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- In reply to: Kris Kennaway: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: amd64 6% slower than i386?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|