Re: 6.0 and "options PREEMPTION"

From: Kirk Strauser (kirk_at_strauser.com)
Date: 10/30/05

  • Next message: Jiri Mikulas: "new ath_hal"
    To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
    Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:18:56 -0600
    
    
    

    On Friday 28 October 2005 08:04 am, Robert Watson wrote:

    > With the advent of "include" support in newer FreeBSD versions, I find I
    > generally have my own include file include GENERIC, then add
    > nodevice/nooptions to remove things I don't want, and device/options to add
    > things I do want.

    I'd like to move to such a setup, too. How do you disable the "cpu
    I486_CPU" (etc.) lines from an included file?

    -- 
    Kirk Strauser
    
    



  • Next message: Jiri Mikulas: "new ath_hal"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 5.1->5.2
      ... Robert Watson wrote: ... >> Compiled fine with this setup. ... I need ipfilter as it's doing my source ... >> interface according to source) Am I just being stupid here somehow? ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
      ... Robert Watson wrote: ... Unfortunately, malloc cannot muck with CPU affinity, since that's up to the application. ... Therefore, as you say, jemalloc implements arena affinity. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal)
      ... Robert Watson wrote: ... Unfortunately, malloc cannot muck with CPU affinity, since that's up to the application. ... Therefore, as you say, jemalloc implements arena affinity. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)