Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)
From: David Xu (davidxu_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: M. Warner Losh: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Rock: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:37:09 +0800 To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
M. Warner Losh wrote:
>Actually, ioport reads can be faster than the 1us that's widely
>quoted. ioport reads can be as fast as ~125ns (2 cycles at 16MHz).
>However, experience has shown that they are rarely this fast. I've
>seen 8MB/s pio over the pci bus on some custom hardware we have, which
>2Mreads/sec which is about 500ns per read. I think that the pci
>hardware that I was reading had a few extra wait states...
>
>The 1us/read is for devices on the ISA bus or for hardware that
>emulates this timing.
>
>Warner
>
>
>
>
The ioport speed is also unstable, on my IBM T43 thinkpad notebook,
if I load wireless driver, the gettimeofday syscall will be 4 times slower
than no wireless driver loaded, though I am not using the wireless
network.
David Xu
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: M. Warner Losh: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Next in thread: Daniel Rock: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Some additional tests run on my performance testing
... The most common suggestion I received was "use FreeBSD 4.8", ... - Can someone
please try the tests on SCSI hardware? ... pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0 ...
on ppbus0 ... (freebsd-performance) - Re: Linux does not detect hardware
... can't use modem, floppy, usb, etc. ... > This modem appear to be interfacing
with the PCI bus, so I did a PCI scan ... Debian has a few packages which can assist in
hardware detection: ... Diagnostic tools for many non-PCI ethernet cards ...
(comp.os.linux.setup) - Re: How to debug complete kernel lock-ups
... specialized output cards. ... through the PCI bus AFAIU. ... Does
this mean I need some kind of PCI bus analyzer (i.e. hardware) at ... in the kernel
causing us grief. ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: New build - halt on ACPI Controller
... There are a remarkably large number of hardware adapters in that list ... Assuming
PCI Bus 0 is ... though there might well be an IRQ sharing compatability issue with
one ... approach to such POST time boot hangs is to minimise the hardware ... (uk.comp.homebuilt) - Re: [SLE] SCSI card selection
... >> Frank, ... >> to that the PCI bus is compatible with your
motherboard. ... >> hardware. ... (SuSE)